Flames Scoring Chances, Game 2 versus Oilers

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20021

Team	Period	Time	Note	CGY						Opponent
CGY	1	18:09	20 goal	4	7	16	20	23	34	5	19	32	35	71	91	5v5
EDM	1	16:15		3	12	21	25	28	34	10	22	24	35	44	83	5v5
EDM	1	16:00		3	12	21	25	28	34	10	22	24	35	44	83	5v5
EDM	1	14:14	PP chance	4	21	24	28	34		19	27	35	37	77	91	4v5
EDM	1	14:12	PP chance	4	21	24	28	34		19	27	35	37	77	91	4v5
EDM	1	14:02	PP chance	4	21	24	28	34		19	27	35	37	77	91	4v5
EDM	1	13:48		3	15	17	22	28	34	5	19	27	35	71	91	5v5
EDM	1	13:47	27 goal	3	15	17	22	28	34	5	19	27	35	71	91	5v5
EDM	1	10:52	PP chance	7	17	22	28	34		10	22	35	44	71	83	4v5
CGY	1	7:52	25 goal	3	4	12	21	25	34	19	24	32	35	44		5v4
CGY	1	7:18		3	16	20	24	28	34	10	22	35	37	77	83	5v5
EDM	1	6:10		7	8	11	17	22	34	13	27	35	44	67	71	5v5
EDM	1	1:26		4	7	11	16	23	34	19	32	35	37	77	91	5v5
CGY	1	0:01		4	5	15	17	22	34	5	13	27	35	67	71	5v5
CGY	2	19:03		3	12	21	25	28	34	10	22	35	37	77	83	5v5
EDM	2	14:40	PP chance	4	7	17	22	34		19	27	35	37	77	91	4v5
EDM	2	14:39	PP chance	4	7	17	22	34		19	27	35	37	77	91	4v5
CGY	2	7:36		3	12	21	25	28	34	5	10	22	35	71	83	5v5
CGY	2	6:39	3 goal	3	4	15	17	22	34	5	13	18	35	44		5v4
EDM	2	5:59		7	8	11	23	33	34	18	32	35	37	46	77	5v5
CGY	2	4:11	PP chance	5	15	17	22	28	34	5	19	24	32	35		5v4
EDM	2	3:28		7	16	20	23	28	34	5	10	22	24	35		5v4
EDM	2	2:34		4	5	20	22	33	34	19	24	32	35	44	91	5v5
EDM	2	2:03	67 goal	3	11	22	28	33	34	5	13	27	35	67	71	5v5
EDM	3	18:20		5	12	21	25	28	34	19	32	35	37	77	91	5v5
CGY	3	17:14		3	4	16	20	24	34	5	13	24	27	35	67	5v5
CGY	3	10:45		3	15	16	24	28	34	19	32	35	37	77	91	5v5
CGY	3	10:23		3	15	16	22	28	34	19	32	35	37	77	91	5v5
EDM	3	9:29		4	5	17	21	25	34	10	22	24	35	44	83	5v5
EDM	3	7:00	89 goal	4	5	15	17	22	34	5	18	35	46	71	89	5v5
CGY	3	6:30		4	5	15	17	22	34	5	13	32	35	67	71	5v5
CGY	3	5:26		3	12	24	25	28	34	10	19	22	24	35	44	5v5
EDM	3	1:06		4	17	22	25	28	34	19	32	35	44	77	89	5v5

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
3	D. PHANEUF	18:40	7	5	3:00	2	0	3:06	0	0
4	J. BOUWMEESTER	21:56	4	5	2:47	2	0	5:19	0	5
5	M. GIORDANO	14:50	2	4	0:51	1	0	0:20	0	0
7	A. PARDY	13:31	1	3	0:19	0	1	2:01	0	3
8	S. KRONWALL	8:02	0	2	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
11	F. SJOSTROM	10:07	0	4	0:00	0	0	1:40	0	0
12	J. IGINLA	14:11	3	3	1:41	1	0	0:00	0	0
15	N. DAWES	12:38	4	3	2:39	2	0	0:00	0	0
16	D. BOYD	11:14	5	1	0:08	0	1	0:57	0	0
17	R. BOURQUE	12:36	2	6	2:08	2	0	2:44	0	3
20	C. GLENCROSS	11:58	3	1	0:08	0	1	2:18	0	0
21	O. JOKINEN	14:36	2	4	1:54	1	0	0:23	0	3
22	D. LANGKOW	14:44	3	7	1:55	2	0	3:00	0	3
23	E. NYSTROM	10:47	1	2	0:08	0	1	1:38	0	0
24	C. CONROY	8:36	4	0	0:00	0	0	3:20	0	3
25	D. MOSS	13:26	3	5	1:10	1	0	0:00	0	0
28	R. REGEHR	19:31	6	7	0:57	1	1	5:14	0	4
33	B. PRUST	8:52	0	3	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
34	M. KIPRUSOFF	48:03	10	13	3:57	3	1	8:00	0	6

Period	Totals		EV		PP		5v3 PP		SH		5v3 SH
1	4	10	3	6	1	0	0	0	0	4	0	0
2	4	6	2	3	2	1	0	0	0	2	0	0
3	5	4	5	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Totals	13	20	10	13	3	1	0	0	0	6	0	0

I'm currently re-watching some of the first few games of the year with the purpose of counting the scoring chances. This is the first of 4 games that will appear hear over the next week (games 2 through 5) not including any regularly scheduled games, of course.

I'd have to say this was probably the Flames luckiest win of the year thus far. They were grossly outshot and outchanced and I wouldn't have classified 3 of their 4 goals as chances if they hadn't gone in. In fact, I excluded the final Moss tally outright since it was little more than a giant error by Khabibulin that led to the goal. I think the win could have very easily been a 5-1 loss if not for some favorable bounces and Patrick O'Sullivan missing repeatedly missing the net on glorious scoring chances.

The only Flames well in the black this evening? Dustin Boyd (+4) and Craig Conroy (+4). Boyd also led the team in terms of chance (5), all of which came at ES. Given some of his other notable efforts, that seems like a trend to me, so it'll be interesting to see what Boyd's totals and differentials are through the first 10 games are.

Here's how Dennis scored the game from an Oilers perspective. He was little kinder to the Flames than I was, apparently, finishing with a 19-16 figure favor of Edmonton.

Flames Scoring Chances, game 9 versus Columbus

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20111

Team	Period	Time	Note	CGY						Opponent
CGY	1	17:31		4	6	15	17	22	34	1	10	16	20	36	61	5v5
CGY	1	17:18	22 goal	4	6	15	17	22	34	1	10	17	20	36	61	5v5
CGY	1	16:03	20 goal	3	12	20	24	28	34	1	3	18	50	93	97	5v5
CGY	1	15:14	PP chance	3	4	12	20	21	22	1	18	50	51	97		5v4
CBJ	1	13:52	SH goal	3	5	15	17	22	34	1	26	36	61			5v3
CGY	1	10:39		3	12	20	24	28	34	1	3	18	50	93	97	5v5
CGY	1	8:36	4 goal	4	12	24	28	34		1	3	16	61	97		4v4
CBJ	1	4:29	PP chance	3	11	23	34	44		1	10	14	16	50	93	4v5
CBJ	1	3:05		4	6	12	16	21	34	1	3	15	25	26	97	5v5
CBJ	1	0:55	PP chance	6	20	24	34	44		1	14	16	50	51	93	4v5
CBJ	1	0:30	PP chance	6	11	23	34	44		1	10	14	16	50	93	4v5
CBJ	2	19:08	PP goal	4	6	24	34			1	6	16	18	20	61	3v5
CBJ	2	18:20	PP goal	3	4	20	23	34		1	10	14	16	50	93	4v5
CBJ	2	16:35		3	6	15	17	22	34	1	3	16	20	61	97	5v5
CGY	2	13:54		5	15	17	22	28	34	1	18	36	50	51		5v4
CBJ	2	9:48		3	11	21	23	28	34	1	10	15	25	26	36	5v5
CGY	2	7:20		5	16	23	33	34	44	1	3	10	14	26	40	5v5
CGY	2	6:16	3 goal	3	5	17	20	21	34	1	6	15	18	50	51	5v5
CBJ	2	1:25		3	12	16	28	33	34	1	10	14	17	36	40	5v5
CBJ	2	0:55	PP chance	4	24	28	34			1	6	16	18	20	61	3v5
CBJ	2	0:13	PP chance	4	24	28	34			1	6	16	18	20	61	3v5
CBJ	3	19:21	PP chance	4	24	28	34			1	6	16	18	20	61	3v5
CGY	3	14:35		4	6	15	22	33	34	1	3	6	14	16	61	5v5
CBJ	3	9:26		5	11	21	23	34	44	1	6	16	20	51	93	5v5
CGY	3	7:14	12 goal	4	6	11	12	21	34	1	6	16	20	51	61	5v5
CBJ	3	6:44		5	16	23	33	34	44	1	10	14	17	25	36	5v5
CBJ	3	6:21		5	11	21	23	34	44	1	6	10	14	17	25	5v5
CBJ	3	5:45		4	6	15	17	22	34	1	16	20	36	51	61	5v5
CBJ	3	4:49		4	6	12	20	24	34	1	3	18	50	93	97	5v5
CGY	3	4:28		3	12	20	24	28	34	1	3	18	50	93	97	5v5
CGY	3	4:05	11 goal	3	11	21	23	28	34	1	10	14	17	25	36	5v5

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
3	D. PHANEUF	15:53	5	3	4:10	1	0	1:10	0	2
4	J. BOUWMEESTER	14:03	5	3	3:09	1	0	3:17	0	1
5	M. GIORDANO	13:32	2	3	2:05	1	0	0:00	0	0
6	C. SARICH	14:08	4	4	1:07	0	0	3:43	0	2
10	B. MCGRATTAN	2:37	0	0	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
11	F. SJOSTROM	12:28	2	3	0:00	0	0	2:08	0	2
12	J. IGINLA	13:33	5	3	3:47	1	0	0:00	0	0
15	N. DAWES	10:34	3	2	2:08	1	0	0:00	0	0
16	D. BOYD	8:58	1	3	2:15	0	0	1:50	0	0
17	R. BOURQUE	10:46	3	2	2:11	1	0	2:39	0	0
20	C. GLENCROSS	10:14	4	1	2:37	1	0	2:32	0	2
21	O. JOKINEN	14:29	3	4	2:13	1	0	0:00	0	0
22	D. LANGKOW	11:08	3	2	1:43	2	0	2:39	0	0
23	E. NYSTROM	13:42	2	4	0:00	0	0	1:01	0	3
24	C. CONROY	9:30	4	1	0:00	0	0	1:55	0	1
28	R. REGEHR	14:11	5	2	0:38	1	0	3:50	0	0
33	B. PRUST	8:33	2	2	1:07	0	0	0:00	0	0
34	M. KIPRUSOFF	42:56	11	9	5:39	1	0	7:25	0	4
44	A. JOHNSON	14:21	1	3	0:41	0	0	2:56	0	3

Period	Totals		EV		PP		5v3 PP		SH		5v3 SH
1	6	5	5	1	1	0	0	1	0	3	0	0
2	3	7	2	3	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	3
3	4	6	4	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Totals	13	18	11	9	2	0	0	1	0	4	0	4

Now I know Why Jay Feaster isn't a GM anymore

I've picked on Feaster before, but I think his latest item at THN is even more reprehensible than his Heatley offering.

This time, he's congratulating himself on not trading for Tomas Vokoun, whom he argues has yet to carry his team to the post-season and last year, when new coach Pete DeBoer really needed him to elevate his play, he faltered, stumbling badly enough that DeBoer handed the starting reins to backup Craig Anderson down the stretch.

Holy shit, the list of things wrong with this claim is staggering.

Let's get the obvious stuff out of the way: Vokoun has been one of the best goalies in the league the last few years, despite playing on some pretty crappy teams. His SV% the since 2005-06 has been .919, .920, .919 and lastly .926...you know, the year he "faltered badly down the stretch". That save rate was second in the entire league, BTW, behind Vezina winner Tim Thomas.

Anyways, Feaster ignores the fact that Florida was the worst team in the league in terms of preventing shots last year and were 17th in the league in terms of goals for. The only reason they were within spitting distance of the post-season was - that's right - out of this world goaltending (from both Vokoun and Anderson). To place their failure to make the play-offs at Vokoun's feet isn't just wrong, it borders on the obscene. His "stumbling down the stretch" was doubtless little more than a near unsustainable SV% coming back down to earth - which is especially disastrous when a team gives up almost 35 shots a game. "Alright, Tomas" said coach Peter one day after practice. "I know you're in the top 5 in terms of SV% in the league and we allow teams to routinely pepper you with shots on a nightly basis...but I really need you to elevate your play down the stretch..." Pfffft. As I wrote back in February in response to the news that the Panthers would be keeping Bouwmeester:

The lone factor holding the Panthers in the race is that unsustainable .933 ES SV%. Should that uncanny number continue for the rest of the season and squeeze the cats into the play-offs, I have no doubt they'd be swept aside in short order by whoever they'd end up facing in the first round.

Of course, Feaster also ignores the fact that Vokoun has indeed appeared in the post season...and although he's never won a series, his career SV% of .922 in the play-offs suggests he's at least done his part when he's made it there.

Damn your lack of clutch Vokoun!

Feaster continues:

Not surprisingly, Vokoun has faltered and the Panthers find themselves desperately needing help from their backup goalie yet again. The only way for Florida to climb back into the hunt is for Clemmensen to do for his current squad what he did last year in Newark, and time is of the essence.

Seriously. Jay is pointing to Vokoun's .902 SV% through a grand total of five games to start the year as proof positive that he can't "handle the pressure" and needs to his back-up to "save him". This is below-grade messageboard fodder...written by a former NHL exec.

Imagine how history might have changed had we agreed to the deal with Nashville. The Panthers gave up a second round pick in 2007, plus a first- and second-rounder in 2008 for Vokoun. Had we done that deal, that first round pick in 2008 could have been our overall first pick and Steven Stamkos might now be skating in Nashville!

Or maybe with one of the best goalies in the league the Lightning wouldn't have finished last in the NHL, meaning, you know, the pick wouldn't have been first overall.

Reactions: Early season curiosities

Every year, the first 10 games or so are filled with results that seem intuitively screwy (Colorado, anyone?). Sometimes, the new stuff is a sign of real change, and sometimes it's just an artifact of chance and small sample size. Here's some of the things I think are telling and others that will fade with time.

Don't Buy it -

The Colorado Avalanche

The Avs are looking real good right now, but it isn't going to last. They have a terrible shot differential, a 935 SV% and a team SH% of about 14. Both percentages are unsustainable (although I think Anderson is the real deal) and once one or both fall back down to earth, the Avs will too. They're roster is really, really young to boot and will probably hit a wall half way through the season. Best in NW right now, perhaps, but my bet is they still finish last.

Atlanta Thrashers

Another lesser light overachieving, the Thrashers shot differential is even worse than the Avs. Their success has a lot to do with a league best 37.5% PP success rate which will inevitably regress.

Toronto Maple Leafs

As fun as it is to laugh at Toronto and Brian Burke, there's little chance the Leafs are actually this bad. They've suffered through the worst goaltending in the league and currently have a 6% shooting rate. It's a perfect storm of terrible afflicting TOR right now and it's bound to end eventually. If Gustavsson returns and can at least be average, the SH% should correct itself to some degree and the Leafs will start winning some games.

Calgary Flames

Calgary's off to a "good" start, but the truth is they've allowed the most shots against in the league, have a shot differential well in the red and their money forwards have been abysmal in just about every aspect of the game. Notable performances by depth players, the 4th liners and a sky-high PP percentage (34.8) has allowed them to outscore their issues, but that won't last forever. Unless Sutter get's the team in the black in terms of outshooting, things are going to get ugly here in town very soon.

Edmonton Oilers

Same deal as above, except it's ES SH% that is driving the Oilers bus. Their shot differential is similarly bad, but they've currently scored the most 5on5 goals in the league (22), despite only generating some 23 shots a game. Hemsky's hurt now too. Not going to continue.

Buy it -

Boston Bruins

Most writers in this corner of the web could have called the Bruins decline. not only did they lose a number of decent players this summer (Ward, Kessel, Yelle), much of their success last year was derived from out of this world percentages. The regression was inevitable, which is why I picked them to be a middling club in the EC this season.

Detroit Red Wings

Losing Hudler, Hossa and Samuelsson isn't easily overcome. On top of that, sticking with Osgood in net and backing him with a rookie is probably a mistake. Adding Bertuzzi and losing Franzen for 4 months can't help but further hurt the Red Wings at ES. Zetterberg, Datsuk and Lidstrom are great so they won't tumble too far, but their relative early season struggles look like the real deal - the NHL's best outshooting team the last few years has a SD of just +1.4/game thus far.

Phoenix Coyotes

I know. I can't believe it either. I've seen the Coyotes play a couple of times this year and they look...good. It's a foreign feeling. They are currently 5th in the league in terms of SA/G (26.7) and they have a positive shot differential. Tippett is the real deal and the club actually has some strength down the middle in Hanzal, Lombardi, Lang and Mueller. Doan is, of course, excellent while Michalek and Sauer are underrated, good value players. Bryzgalov and Labarbera are a good bet to prove better than average goaltending as well. I doubt they'll continue to lead their division much longer, but be prepared for them not to suck for the remainder of the year.

Flames Scoring Chances, Game 8 Versus Canucks

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20091

Team	Period	Time	Note	CGY						Opponent
CGY	1	16:13	PP opp	3	4	12	20	21	34	1	3	8	10	21		5v4
CGY	1	16:00	PP opp	3	4	12	20	21	34	1	3	8	10	21		5v4
CGY	1	14:37		4	11	16	23	28	34	1	14	29	33	40	55	5v5
CGY	1	13:31		3	5	12	20	22	34	1	3	10	17	23	26	5v5
CGY	1	12:41	20 goal	4	20	24	28	34		1	3	14	18	26	33	4v5
CGY	1	9:10	15 goal	5	6	15	17	22	34	1	10	21	23	55		5v4
VAN	1	8:45		4	6	12	20	24	34	1	5	8	26	33	40	5v5
CGY	1	7:39		7	10	11	16	28	34	1	10	18	23	29	42	5v5
VAN	1	6:12		3	4	12	20	21	34	1	23	26	33	55		5v4
CGY	1	6:07		3	4	12	20	21	34	1	5	26	33	55		5v4
VAN	1	3:49		4	6	12	20	24	34	1	8	14	23	33	40	5v5
VAN	1	1:09	PP opp	4	20	24	28	34		1	14	18	23	26	33	4v5
VAN	1	0:35	PP opp	4	11	21	28	34		1	14	18	23	26	33	4v5
VAN	2	14:23		4	6	15	16	22	34	1	21	23	26	29	33	5v5
CGY	2	13:22	3 goal	3	17	20	22	28	34	1	14	17	21	23	29	5v5
CGY	2	10:44	16 goal	3	10	16	28	33	34	1	15	23	24	29	37	5v5
VAN	2	9:10		3	11	21	23	28	34	1	3	10	18	42	55	5v5
CGY	2	8:26	10 goal	5	7	10	16	33	34	1	15	23	24	29	37	5v5
VAN	2	5:43		5	7	20	21	23	34	1	3	10	18	42	55	5v5
CGY	2	2:03		5	7	12	20	24	34	1	5	8	10	18	42	5v5
VAN	2	1:14		4	6	11	21	23	34	1	14	23	29	33	40	5v5
VAN	3	13:05	VCR goal	5	7	10	16	33	34	8	14	23	30	33	37	5v5
CGY	3	11:47		3	15	17	22	28	34	3	17	18	30	40	55	5v5
CGY	3	10:55		5	7	10	16	33	34	8	10	23	24	30	37	5v5
VAN	3	7:01		4	6	11	21	23	34	5	8	14	26	30	33	5v5
VAN	3	2:58	PP goal	6	24	28	34			3	18	23	26	30	33	3v5
VAN	3	2:17	PP goal	3	17	24	28	34		5	14	17	29	30	40	4v5

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
3	D. PHANEUF	15:19	4	1	6:01	3	1	1:26	0	1
4	J. BOUWMEESTER	15:29	1	5	5:45	3	1	4:07	1	2
5	M. GIORDANO	12:24	4	2	4:54	1	0	0:00	0	0
6	C. SARICH	14:10	0	5	2:51	1	0	2:02	0	0
7	A. PARDY	13:30	4	2	0:03	0	0	0:30	0	0
10	B. MCGRATTAN	5:55	4	1	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
11	F. SJOSTROM	11:20	2	3	0:04	0	0	1:47	0	1
12	J. IGINLA	14:20	2	2	5:59	3	1	0:06	0	0
15	N. DAWES	9:02	1	1	5:45	1	0	0:00	0	0
16	D. BOYD	7:17	5	2	0:16	0	0	0:20	0	0
17	R. BOURQUE	9:51	2	0	4:27	1	0	2:19	0	1
20	C. GLENCROSS	14:42	3	3	4:53	3	1	0:58	1	1
21	O. JOKINEN	13:34	0	4	5:28	3	1	0:47	0	1
22	D. LANGKOW	11:25	3	1	4:58	1	0	2:12	0	0
23	E. NYSTROM	11:21	1	4	0:16	0	0	1:49	0	0
24	C. CONROY	11:35	1	2	0:00	0	0	1:32	1	2
28	R. REGEHR	14:39	5	1	1:50	0	0	3:39	1	3
33	B. PRUST	6:38	3	1	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
34	M. KIPRUSOFF	42:42	9	8	10:42	4	1	5:46	1	3

Period	Totals		EV		PP		5v3 PP		SH		5v3 SH
1	8	5	3	2	4	1	0	0	1	2	0	0
2	4	4	4	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
3	2	4	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1
4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Totals	14	13	9	8	4	1	0	0	1	3	0	1

Flames Scoring Chances, Game 7 versus Columbus

Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20074

Team	Period	Time	Note	CGY						Opponent
CGY	1	18:23		6	7	15	23	24	34	1	6	18	50	51	93	5v5
CGY	1	15:47		4	5	17	20	21	34	1	8	15	16	20	97	5v5
CBJ	1	15:15		3	11	12	22	28	34	1	8	18	50	93	97	5v5
CBJ	1	13:37		3	12	17	28	34		1	3	10	50	93		4v4
CGY	1	12:44		3	4	12	21	22	34	1	8	26	50	97		5v4
CBJ	1	8:53		3	17	20	21	28	34	1	3	10	18	50	93	5v5
CBJ	1	8:49		3	17	20	21	28	34	1	3	10	18	50	93	5v5
CGY	1	7:45		4	5	11	12	22	34	1	8	25	26	61	97	5v5
CGY	1	7:10		3	15	23	24	28	34	1	6	16	20	51	61	5v5
CGY	1	3:41	20 Goal	6	7	17	20	21	34	1	3	10	15	20	26	5v5
CBJ	1	0:44		3	15	23	24	28	34	1	6	16	20	51	61	5v5
CGY	2	17:16		6	7	15	23	24	34	1	3	10	18	50	93	5v5
CBJ	2	15:05		4	5	11	12	22	34	1	3	10	16	25	61	5v5
CBJ	2	11:04		4	5	17	20	21	34	1	3	10	16	20	61	5v5
CBJ	2	11:02		4	5	17	20	21	34	1	10	16	20	51	61	5v5
CBJ	2	9:47		3	10	16	28	33	34	1	6	18	50	51	93	5v5
CBJ	2	9:27		3	10	16	28	33	34	1	6	18	50	51	93	5v5
CBJ	2	5:20	PP opp	4	16	20	28	34		1	6	18	20	51	61	4v5
CBJ	2	4:28	PP goal	4	24	28	34			1	6	16	18	20	61	3v5
CBJ	2	3:36	PP opp	4	16	17	28	34		1	10	14	16	50	93	4v5
CBJ	2	2:52	PP opp	3	7	11	23	34		1	6	8	18	20	61	4v5
CBJ	2	2:39	PP opp	3	7	11	23	34		1	6	8	18	20	61	4v5
CBJ	2	2:24	20 goal	3	6	7	11	23	34	1	6	8	18	20	61	5v5
CGY	3	15:23		6	7	16	23	33	34	6	18	40	50	51		5v4
CBJ	3	14:46		3	15	17	22	28	34	3	10	18	50	93		5v4
CBJ	3	14:06		4	5	12	20	21	34	8	15	25	26	97		5v4
CGY	3	11:38		4	5	15	17	22	34	6	15	25	26	51		5v4
CGY	3	8:14		3	12	20	21	28	34	8	15	25	26	97		5v4
CGY	3	3:46		6	7	11	16	23	34	3	10	15	25	26		5v4
CGY	3	1:44		4	5	16	23	24	34	6	15	25	26	51		5v4

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
3	D. PHANEUF	13:53	1	8	6:14	2	1	0:44	0	2
4	J. BOUWMEESTER	13:26	2	3	7:26	3	1	2:24	0	2
5	M. GIORDANO	12:08	2	3	5:46	2	1	0:00	0	0
6	C. SARICH	11:34	3	1	4:07	2	0	0:49	0	0
7	A. PARDY	8:58	3	1	5:58	2	0	1:33	0	2
10	B. MCGRATTAN	5:19	0	2	0:00	0	0	0:00	0	0
11	F. SJOSTROM	10:41	1	3	3:56	1	0	0:58	0	2
12	J. IGINLA	11:29	1	3	7:20	2	1	0:00	0	0
15	N. DAWES	7:09	3	1	5:54	1	1	0:00	0	0
16	D. BOYD	6:24	0	2	2:38	3	0	1:09	0	2
17	R. BOURQUE	11:24	2	5	5:19	1	1	1:30	0	1
20	C. GLENCROSS	10:07	2	4	4:42	1	1	1:06	0	1
21	O. JOKINEN	11:07	2	4	5:42	2	1	0:05	0	0
22	D. LANGKOW	11:20	1	2	6:15	2	1	1:12	0	0
23	E. NYSTROM	9:03	3	2	4:46	3	0	1:26	0	2
24	C. CONROY	9:06	3	1	2:37	1	0	0:38	0	0
28	R. REGEHR	15:01	1	7	4:41	1	1	2:29	0	2
33	B. PRUST	3:25	0	2	2:00	1	0	0:00	0	0
34	M. KIPRUSOFF	37:26	6	11	17:05	6	2	3:57	0	4

Period	Totals		EV		PP		5v3 PP		SH		5v3 SH
1	6	5	5	5	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2	1	11	1	6	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	1
3	5	2	0	0	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Totals	12	18	6	11	6	2	0	0	0	4	0	1